Can anyone explain to me to rules for when you would use “i” meaning “to” infront of a verb? I’m confused as I’ve seen sentences containing both options and I can’t seem to figure out a pattern. For example I’ve seen ymlacio (to relax) and i ymlacio both being used to mean the same thing.
“to i or not to i” is one of the puzzling things that crops up from time to time, so instead of trying to re-invent the wheel, I’d like to link to a previous post:
But one of the main takeaway points is that instead of thinking of the “i” being in front of the second verb, it is rather a necessary preposition following the first verb.
However, it’s also worth pointing out that sometimes the i is there because it ‘goes with’ the preceding verb e.g. dwi’n moyn ymlacio compared to dwi’n mynd i ymlacio … the i in the second one is because mynd is almost always followed by an i.
dwi’n moyn is the correct form, although in speech sometimes the 'n can get swallowed up so it can sometimes sound like dwi moyn (especially in fast speech).
Also, I believe some people leave it out under the influence of the way eisau/isio/isie is used.
Either way is fine, obviously.
Edited to add: I think something similar happens with dwi methu, where the 'n gets swallowed up by the initial m, leading to the southern equivalent dw i ffili also losing the 'n.